RSS Feed

Posts Tagged ‘Investment’

U.S. economy grew at tepid 1.9% during first quarter

June 25, 2011 by Real Estate Investor Comments Off
Linda Young – AHN News Writer

New York, NY, United States (AHN) – The United States economy grew at a slow 1.9 percent pace during the first quarter of the year a slowdown in growth that Federal Reserve policy makers hope will only be a temporary.

In contrast, the economy grew at a more robust 3.1 percent rate in the previous quarter. Still the 1.9 percent figure was better than the 1.8 percent rise in gross domestic product predicted for the first quarter by government officials last month.

Real gross domestic product is the total output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the U.S.

“The increase in real GDP in the first quarter primarily reflected positive contributions from personal consumption expenditures (PCE), private inventory investment, exports, and nonresidential fixed investment that were partly offset by negative contributions from federal government spending and state and local government spending. Imports, which are a subtraction in the calculation of GDP, increased,” the U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis said in a statement.

Article © AHN – All Rights Reserved

View full post on Economy, Business And Finance Stories

 

China Economy at Risk of ‘Hard Landing’ After 2013, Roubini Says

June 12, 2011 by Real Estate Investor Comments Off

China’s economy is at risk of a “hard landing” after 2013 as efforts to spur growth through investment cause excess capacity, said Nouriel Roubini, the New York University professor who predicted the financial crisis.

View full post on Finance Stories

 

West Begins Building Aid Pipeline to Arab Spring Economies

May 23, 2011 by Real Estate Investor Comments Off
The Media Line Staff

Tel Aviv, Israel (TML) – Western powers and their allies in the Middle East hope to grease the wheels of democracy and political stability as they begin to release billions of dollars in loans and other financial aid to the region’s Arab Spring economies.

The economies of countries like Egypt, Tunisia and Jordan are facing a near-perfect storm of political unrest combined with negative growth and rising prices for imported energy and food. But the emerging aid pipeline may be clogged by domestic opposition inside donor countries. Recipients may balk at the conditions placed on much of the aid.

Aid could ease the way for Egypt and Tunisia to evolve into Western-friendly democracies as well as give a boost to beleaguered friends like Jordan’s King Abdullah. Without it, deteriorating economic conditions risk strengthening the hand of already powerful Islamic movements and undermining public confidence in the free markets and private business that economists say are needed to ensure long-term prosperity.

“These countries, particularly Egypt, face a financial hole and their economies have come to a standstill. The way out is to spend money which their governments don’t have,” said Paul Rivlin, author of Arab Economies in the Twenty-First Century. But the recipients will have to show they are taking the right political and economic measures. “The U.S wants to draw them back into a Western orientation. But the political systems in these countries may draw them elsewhere.”

Egypt, as the biggest of the Middle East’s troubled economies and the country most likely to set the direction of the region political, is the focus of the aid.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) kicked off the effort May 12, saying it would respond to Egypt’s request for as much as $12 billion. That amount has since has been lowered to $4 billion. But in the meantime, U.S. President Barack Obama last week offered to forgive some $1 billion in Egyptian debt and. Egypt is reportedly close to an agreement with the World Bank to receive loans worth $2.2 billion.

But the biggest largesse of them all may come from Saudi Arabia, which on Saturday pledged $4 billion in the form of soft loans, deposits and grants, the Egyptian Middle East News Agency (MENA) reported, citing Field Marshal Mohamed Hussein Tantawi, the head of Egypt’s ruling military council, as saying.

Egypt won’t be the only beneficiary of international aid.

On Saturday, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), which was formed to smooth eastern Europe’s transition to free market democracies, is working on a program that may eventually lead to investment of as much as 2.5 billion euros ($3.5 billion) a year in the Middle East. The EBRD said it is considering a request by Egypt to become a country of operations. Morocco, another EBRD shareholder, has also expressed an interest in qualifying, it said.

On Monday, the Group of Eight (G-8) – a forum for many of the world’s biggest economies – will discuss how they can contribute to modernizing the economies of the Middle East, without pledging dollar amounts for assistance. A special session will be devoted to Tunisia and Egypt.

Tunisia plans to attract $5 billion a year in foreign aid, loans and private investments over the next five years during meetings at the G-8 summit, Finance Minister Jelloul Ayed said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal Friday. Tunisia would apply for a $500 million standby loan, possibly from the World Bank.

Obama told a visiting King Abdullah that he would provide Jordan with several hundred millions of dollars in aid, channeled through the Overseas Private Investment Corp. (OPIC). Obama said the funds would “leverage ultimately about $1 billion for economic development in Jordan.”

Rivlin said Washington will lead the aid drive and should America judge that the Arab Spring economies aren’t meeting its conditions it “will be difficult” for Europe and international institutions to provide it either.

The Arab Spring economies are in bad shape by almost every measure. The five countries hit hardest by turmoil will show a combined drop in economic output of about 2.3% this year, according to figures based on a forecast by the Institute for International Finance (IIF) released in early May.

Egyptian Finance Minister Samir Radwan estimates his country’s budget deficit will top 10% of gross domestic product in the coming fiscal year, up from a previous forecast of 7.9% and has to borrow to cover the gap. Its official foreign currency reserves have fallen to $28 billion, but some economists think the drop is bigger than being report.

Uri Dadush and Marwan Muasher, from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, expressed concern that it will be difficult to convince the leaders of Egypt and other recipient countries to undertake the economic reforms needed to rekindle economic growth and enable them to eventually get off aid.

So far, the transitional governments of the region, as well as veteran leaders trying to retain power, have increased subsidies for consumer goods and promised to create jobs, all at a cost to badly strained budgets and economic efficiency. But Dadush and Muasher add that the bigger problem may be convincing Arab public opinion that free markets are beneficial.

“Change in the Middle East is about refusing an autocratic political system and calling for democracy – without a clear vision for what economic system should be put in place,” they wrote in the National Interest on April 13. “There is a significant possibility that the governments that ultimately emerge out of this crisis will renounce previous economic reforms as misguided.”

Indeed, many analysts think Egypt won’t agree to the economic reforms the IMF typically demands in exchange for its aid, such as subsidy cuts, for fear that they will spark another round of mass protests like the kind that brought down President Husni Mubarak in February.

“For understandable political reasons, the Egyptian government says that it is unthinkable to cut subsidies for food or energy. But can the IMF simply extend a loan without any conditionality? I doubt it,” Gideon Rachman wrote in the Financial Times last week.

Back at home, both American and European leaders will have to make a case for sending billions of dollars overseas at a time when they are experiencing severe economic difficulties of their own. Europe is trying to put out debt fires in Greece, Portugal and Ireland.

In the U.S., President Barack Obama is battling Congress over increasing the country’s debt ceiling. He faces opposition from a Republic-controlled House of Representatives to helping countries whose allegiance to America is more in doubt as long-time pro-Western despots are replaced by governments whose views are yet to be fully articulated.

The U.S. budget is weighed down by $14 trillion in debt as the White House and Congress fight over raising the national debt ceiling.

“Considering our own national debt, we cannot afford to forgive up to $1 billion of Egypt’s debt,” Elena Ros-Lehtinen, the chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said last Thursday. “The U.S. should only provide assistance to Egypt after we know that Egypt’s new government will not include the Muslim Brotherhood and will be democratic, pro-American and committed to abiding by peace agreements with Israel.”

Article © AHN – All Rights Reserved

View full post on All Stories

 

SEC files charges against former Goldman Sachs director for insider trading

March 2, 2011 by Real Estate Investor Comments Off
Vittorio Hernandez – AHN News

D.C., Washington, United States (AHN) – The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed Tuesday charges against Rajat Gupta, a former director of American bank Goldman Sachs, for providing illegal insider information.

The SEC said Gupta passed illegal tips about Goldman Sachs to hedge fund billionaire Raj Rajaratnam, the founder of the Galleon Group who is scheduled to be tried next week for insider trading charges.

Gupta passed information about Goldman Sachs’s and Procter & Gamble’s earnings and Warren Buffett’s $5 billion investment in Goldman in 2008. Gupta was also a board member of Procter & Gamble, but resigned on Tuesday.

The charges against Gupta is part of the widening probe on insider trading initiated by the SEC against lawyers, consultants, accountants, corporate insiders and hedge fund managers.

The 62-year old Gupta, a senior executive at McKinsey & Company, is the most prominent business executive charged by the SEC. In the last 18 months, federal prosecutors in Manhattan have filed insider trading charges against 46 people, but most of them are junior traders, lawyers or midlevel executives.

The SEC said Rajaratnam used tips provided by Gupta to pocket more than $18 million of investment gains or avoided losses. The regulator said Gupta betrayed the highest trust given to him by leading public companies by disclosing their most sensitive and valuable secrets.

The SEC said Gupta called Rajaratnam right after Goldman Sachs directors met and approved a $5 billion infusion by Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway in September 2008. Rajaratnam then ordered Galleon funds to purchase Goldman shares and sold the stocks at a profit a day after the Berkshire investment was announced.

Gupta’s lawyer, Gary Naftalis, said the SEC charges were baseless. Naftalis said Gupta did nothing wrong and stands by his 40-year record of ethical conduct, integrity and commitment to keeping clients’ confidence.

Article © AHN – All Rights Reserved

View full post on Economy, Business And Finance Stories

 

Temasek Buys More Shares in NIB Bank as It Focuses on Asia

by Real Estate Investor Comments Off

Temasek Holdings Pte, the biggest shareholder of NIB Bank Ltd., bought more shares in the Pakistani lender as Singapore’s state-owned investment company increases holdings in Asia.

View full post on Finance Stories

 

Barclays Said to Cut Bonuses at Investment Banking Unit by 15%

February 13, 2011 by Real Estate Investor Comments Off

Barclays Plc, Britain’s third- largest bank, reduced bonuses for employees of its investment- banking unit, Barclays Capital, by about 15 percent on average, according to three people with knowledge of the matter.

View full post on Finance Stories

 

Commercial Hard Money Loans – Debunking The Myths

February 3, 2011 by Real Estate Investor Comments Off

While commercial hard money loans might sound as if they come out of a Mafia movie, there is nothing dangerous or especially risky about being granted one of the many commercial loans that are on offer by the different independent financial institutions.

What are Commercial Hard Money Loans?

The word ‘hard’ can be misleading for many people who are applying for this sort of financing. All that it means is that the loan is guaranteed by an asset or a piece of immovable property. The loan will be granted on the strength of the value of the asset in question. Many developers use these type of loans when they are attempting to develop a piece of land into a commercial property that has investment potential as well as the potential of future earnings that will more than cover the loan amount.

The value of these loans is that they are usually funded by private investors. It is worthwhile finding a company who is able to match up potential investors to loan applicants. They will ensure that the loan is completely legal as well as being secured by the property itself and not the personal assets of the owner. Most of the private investors in America today are likely to be private firms who consider that issuing commercial hard money loans is a way of doing business that guarantees them a substantial return on investment. These loans are not usually granted over an extended loan term.

This type of loan is not like a conventional mortgage that is repaid over 30 years. The term is usually between 1 and 5 years and the interest rates are much higher than a conventional loan. While the top end of the scale of interest rates can reach up to 15 % it is still a way of obtaining finance for an investment without having to wait for months or go through an extensive process of paperwork and credit checks.

It is always wise to remember that commercial hard money loans will not cover the full value of the property and it is unusual to find any commercial hard money lender that will over about 60% of the value of the property. If you are buying property then you will have to fund the difference from another source or be prepared to fund it yourself. Commercial hard money loans are granted based on a logical and achievable plan to pay the money back on time and most commercial hard money lenders will need to see a considerable amount of property related experience.

They will not be inclined to lend money to first time investors, unless the risk is very low. Commercial hard money loans are a solution to investment opportunities that many banks have refused due to the economy.

To know more information about Commercial Hard Money Loans and Commercial Financing Services visit ICPFinancial.com

Author: Claire Geonzon
Article Source: EzineArticles.com
Android tablet, netbook

 

Commission blames regulators, banks for financial crisis

January 28, 2011 by Real Estate Investor Comments Off
Vittorio Hernandez – AHN News

Washington, DC, United States (AHN) – The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission released Thursday its report after 18 months of probing the causes of the worst financial disaster in the United States in recent years.

In a 633-page report, the panel blamed both banks and regulators for the crisis.

The report tagged investment firms Goldman Sachs for fueling the subprime mortgage bubble and Merrill Lynch for not providing investors its real financial conditions. The panel also said the Federal Reserve failed in its duty to stop dangerous lending practices, particularly banks participating in very large amounts of high-risk mortgage lending.

The panel said Washington was not prepared for the crisis and its inconsistent response worsened the uncertainty and panic in the financial markets.

The body specifically pointed to three major government officials, former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, current Chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, who was New York Fed president during the financial crisis.

The three officials have not commented on the panel’s report, but the Fed pointed out it has overhauled financial supervision and the New York Fed stressed it was not the main regulators of firms that needed bailouts such as Citigroup and Lehman Brothers. Bernanke said the Fed lacked authority to bail out Lehman because of uncertainty of being paid back.

Aside from the Fed, the panel also chided the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Six members of the commission, led by Chairman Phil Angelides, approved the report. However, the Republicans on the commission opposed the report and came out with two dissenting reports. Angelides acknowledged there were fundamental differences between the Democratic and Republican members of the commission, but added there were also areas of agreement.

Article © AHN – All Rights Reserved

View full post on Economy, Business And Finance Stories

 

Hard Money Lenders and Hard Money Loans

December 24, 2010 by Comments Off

Why A Hard Money Loan.

The reason real estate investors choose to use hard money loans is that they are a source to purchase and rehab property to make a substantial profit that they may not have without the use of this expensive money. These short term loans are expensive and even if they were legal for a home owner to borrow from the private lenders offering these loans it would never be advisable. So how hard are these short term loans, you ask? The answer is threefold. They are restrictive in loan to value, they are high in rate and high in fees.

Restrictive in Loan to Value.

The maximum loan to value for most private loans range from 50% to 75%. No deals are done at the higher loan to value for two reasons. First the hard money lender requires lots of equity in case of default they can list and sell the property quickly because they will in theory be below market value. The reason I say in theory is because there are so many REO’s, Short Sales and foreclosure properties on the market today that what was normally considered an exceptional deal is common place. Therefore, private lenders are more particular about the properties, borrowers and loans they choose to fund.

Secondly, any real estate investment that has less than 30% equity are not good investments for the investors unless they are purchasing the property for the cash flow. In that case they are long term investments and not suitable for the short term nature of these expensive bridge loans.

High Interest Rates.

Whether as n real estate investor buying and or rehabbing commercial or residential investment real estate the interest rates are much higher than conventional commercial or residential investment lending. The rates are higher much because the risks are much higher and there source of these funds are limited. Risk and Reward. Supply and Demand. The risks are higher because these loans are not underwritten based on the standard conventional guidelines and there is a very limited or no secondary market for private bridge loans. This is generally not an issue because the borrowers know these are only short term loans. The terms range typically from 3 to 24 months. Therefore, the higher interest rate is of minimum importance because both lenders and borrowers know that the borrowers have an exit strategy to quickly payoff these high interest rate loans. Most lenders require a viable and verifiable exit strategy before they make will the loans.

Higher Points.

Because these loans are short term in nature the hard money lenders always charge discount points. They may charge 1 to 5 points. In addition the private money brokers will charge 2 to 5 points. An average a borrower will 5 to 10 points. Plus closing costs. These are high fees. They only make sense when an real estate investor will make substantially more money and they have no other way to fund the deals.

Why Use Hard Money Lenders.

Simply to make money. As a real estate investor you have choices in financing your deals. You can choose conventional financing that requires at 30% to 35% down payment for properties that are in good shape. There are many other conventional mortgage criteria including credit, cash reserves, seasoning of funds and property. These all make conventional financing almost impossible.

Another option is to use your own funds and not finance a deal at all. But, most astute real estate investors know that if they can make a net profit of $25,000, $50,000, $100,000 or more using a hard money loan they do not like the fees but they we pay them versus not making any money because of lack of financing.

Louis Jeffries has been a Mortgage Banker for over 20 years. A Investor Rehab Specialist Louis will help you fund you next rehab or construction project. Contact Louis louisj@alldominionmortgage.com 708-299-3244 Visit The Blogs Investor Rehab
Hard Money

Author: Louis Jeffries
Article Source: EzineArticles.com
US State tax list

 

Hard Money Loans – How They Differ From Mortgage Loans

December 18, 2010 by Comments Off

A hard money loan is a loan that is privately funded, usually by companies that specialize in real estate. They give short term real estate loans to people to people (including people who may not be able to get a traditional mortgage) with the purpose that the purchaser fix up and sell the property for a profit. There are many ways that a hard money loan may differ from what most people expect from a real estate loan, but that is the major way, a private money loan is not intended for purchasing a home to live in.

Another way private money loans and bank loans differ is in the requirements to get financing. Hard money loans are generally easier to obtain than mortgages. The credit score necessary is often lower. It is even possible for someone with bad credit to get financing for commercial or investment property.

There are a few reasons why hard money lenders are able to approve loans more easily than banks. The first is that they charge more in interest and fees. They have to in order to compensate for the high risk they are taking.

Another reason they can afford give out these high risk loans is that they generally only give them out for around 65 to 70 percent of the market value of the property. It is up to the buyer to either come up with the difference, or to buy the house for below market value. This is completely feasible in the times we find ourselves in. It is an unfortunate reality that more and more people are getting foreclosed on. By only financing part of the market value of the property, private money lenders make sure if their client does get foreclosed on they can still recover their investment. By selling the property for market value, that way after fees, the lender breaks even.

Another major difference between hard loans and traditional mortgage loans is the length of their repayment period. Most private money loans have a maximum duration of 2 years. After that, if the client wishes to remain with the property, they must refinance.

These are just a few of the main ways in which hard money loans differ from traditional real estate loans. There are also many differences among various private money lenders. If the goal is to get a loan for a commercial or investment property, and little credit and/or a traditional loan doesn’t seem to be the best option, than a hard money loan should be considered. There are plenty of references to be found online, the right answer is always in the hands of the consumer.

Cash advance loans can be a very easy and convenient temporary solution to minor money woes. There are some steps to remember if you decide a cash advance loan is what you want to do.

Author: Hector Sam Charlie
Article Source: EzineArticles.com
Canada duty

 

Powered by Yahoo! Answers