Hard Money Loans

Boston, MA, United States (AHN) – Two investors of Genzyme Corp. are suing the biotechnology company for rejecting an $18.5 billion takeover offer from Sanofi Aventis.

According to Bloomberg, the investors have filed a lawsuit in a Boston court accusing Genzyme of depriving investors the right to “to receive maximum value for their shares.”

Sanofi began a hostile takeover of the Massachusetts-based company early this month. The French pharmaceutical giant made a non-binding offer in July to acquire all of Genzyme’s outstanding shares of common stock for $69 per share.

Genzyme chief executive officer and board chairman Henri Termeer had deemed the price too low and called the offer “opportunistic.”

Termeer had sought a better offer, citing Genzyme’s plans to reduce costs and raise production, and the firm’s outlook for its multiple sclerosis drug, alemtuzumab, as well as for Cerezyme, which is for patients with Gaucher disease, and Fabrazyme for those suffering Fabry disease.

Genzyme’s board last week unanimously rejected the latest proposal from Sanofi because the bid is “based on identical financial terms to two previous unsolicited proposals.”

“The offer fails to compensate shareholders for the value of Genzyme’s existing business, which delivered compound annual revenue growth of 23 percent from 2002-2009,” the board added. “The offer price does not adequately compensate Genzyme’s shareholders for the strategic importance and financial benefit to Sanofi-Aventis of a potential transaction with Genzyme.”

The board urged shareholders not to take action, saying a program had been initiated to inform them of “intrinsic value of the company.”

Sanofi insists the amount represents a premium of 38 percent over Genzyme’s unaffected share price of $49.86 on July 1. The drug maker also said discussions with shareholders who own more than 50 percent of Genzyme revealed that shareholders were “frustrated” with the biotech firm’s “persistent refusal to have meaningful discussions.”

Genzyme is one of the world’s largest biotech companies. Founded in Boston in 1981, it specializes in producing drugs for rare genetic disorders, transplant and immune diseases, and cancer.

View full post on Economy, Business And Finance Stories

Boston, MA, United States (AHN) – Two investors of Genzyme Corp. are suing the biotechnology company for rejecting an $18.5 billion takeover offer from Sanofi Aventis.

According to Bloomberg, the investors have filed a lawsuit in a Boston court accusing Genzyme of depriving investors the right to “to receive maximum value for their shares.”

Sanofi began a hostile takeover of the Massachusetts-based company early this month. The French pharmaceutical giant made a non-binding offer in July to acquire all of Genzyme’s outstanding shares of common stock for $69 per share.

Genzyme chief executive officer and board chairman Henri Termeer had deemed the price too low and called the offer “opportunistic.”

Termeer had sought a better offer, citing Genzyme’s plans to reduce costs and raise production, and the firm’s outlook for its multiple sclerosis drug, alemtuzumab, as well as for Cerezyme, which is for patients with Gaucher disease, and Fabrazyme for those suffering Fabry disease.

Genzyme’s board last week unanimously rejected the latest proposal from Sanofi because the bid is “based on identical financial terms to two previous unsolicited proposals.”

“The offer fails to compensate shareholders for the value of Genzyme’s existing business, which delivered compound annual revenue growth of 23 percent from 2002-2009,” the board added. “The offer price does not adequately compensate Genzyme’s shareholders for the strategic importance and financial benefit to Sanofi-Aventis of a potential transaction with Genzyme.”

The board urged shareholders not to take action, saying a program had been initiated to inform them of “intrinsic value of the company.”

Sanofi insists the amount represents a premium of 38 percent over Genzyme’s unaffected share price of $49.86 on July 1. The drug maker also said discussions with shareholders who own more than 50 percent of Genzyme revealed that shareholders were “frustrated” with the biotech firm’s “persistent refusal to have meaningful discussions.”

Genzyme is one of the world’s largest biotech companies. Founded in Boston in 1981, it specializes in producing drugs for rare genetic disorders, transplant and immune diseases, and cancer.

View full post on Economy, Business And Finance Stories

San Francisco, CA, United States (AHN) – Gap Inc. has resumed using its iconic logo only a week after launching a new design that customers panned as an “amateur PowerPoint presentation.” The retail giant also faced backlash for seeking designs from the public, an action commercial designers have long opposed.

“We’ve learned just how much energy there is around our brand. All roads were leading us back to the blue box, so we’ve made the decision not to use the new logo,” Marka Hansen, president of Gap North America, said in a statement.

The San Francisco-based company announced a new logo on Oct. 4 that used a Helvetica typeface in plain black and a small blue gradient box at the upper right corner. The redesign was made ahead of a marketing campaign to coincide with the holidays.

Many customers, however, expressed extreme disappointment over the change, and inundated the company’s online pages with comments calling the new logo “cheap” and “uninspired.”

Armin Vit, co-founder of the graphic design enterprise UnderConsideration, blogged, “[Helvetica] has the unique ability to make anything look pedestrian and, in this particular case, it makes Old Navy…. look like a luxury brand by comparison. The shaded square on the corner doesn’t help at all either — I’m not one to critique something by saying it looks as if it were done in Microsoft Word but this one is just too unsophisticated.”

Gap, which owns Banana Republic and Old Navy, had used its classic logo for more than two decades since its founding in 1969.

“We chose this design as it’s more contemporary and current. It honors our heritage through the blue box while still taking it forward,” Hansen explained in a post on Huffington Post.

The company began a crowd sourcing project in response to anger over its new logo, an action that only heightened public mockery and spawned new websites such as gapyourself.com and Twitter pages like twitter.com/gaplogo.

AIGA, the professional association for design, wrote Gap executives about its stance against crowd sourcing.

Association president Debbie Millman commented in an online discussion, “I firmly believe that crowd-sourcing and spec work is about designers giving their work away for free. But it is also about an abuse of power. The ‘client’ has it all. The designer has none. Unless, of course, we say no.”

Mule Design co-founder Mike Monteiro also said in an open letter in response to Gap’s call for suggestions, “Never in my experience has any of your employees offered me a free pair of pants because the ones I was wearing looked bad. I wouldn’t expect them to. Their job is to sell me clothes. My job is to sell design.”

Hansen conceded in her statement this week the company “did not go about this in the right way.”

“We’ve learned a lot in this process,” she added. “We recognize that we missed the opportunity to engage with the online community. This wasn’t the right project at the right time for crowd sourcing. There may be a time to evolve our logo, but if and when that time comes, we’ll handle it in a different way.”

View full post on Economy, Business And Finance Stories

Irving, TX, United States (AHN) – Hostess Brands pastry company is recalling its chocolate chip muffins sold throughout the United States because they may contain walnuts, which some people are allergic to.

The company said it discovered that some banana nut muffins, which contain walnuts, were accidentally inserted into chocolate chip muffin packages at a Hostess manufacturing plant.

The packaging for the chocolate chip muffins does not contain the warning, “May contain walnuts.”

The recalled product is labeled Hostess Mini Muffins (Chocolate Chip variety). It is sold in four packs of five muffins each.

Hostess says the error was limited to one day of production.

For more information, consumers can call Hostess’ consumer affairs office at 1-800-483-7253, Monday through Friday, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

View full post on Economy, Business And Finance Stories

Los Angeles, CA, United States (AHN) – Meebo celebrated its fifth anniversary on September 21, and actress Sarah Hyland of ABC’s new smash comedy “Modern Family” was in attendance. Coincidentally, the premiere of “Modern Family” was the next day, September 22.

Hyland took a break from her comedic acting on ABC and went to the party and played Twister, pictured here.

In addition to celebrating its fifth birthday, Meebo released its new social messaging app to the BlackBerry world. The Blackberry app works on all BlackBerry platforms, including the Torch 9800.

Meebo is a company that integrates all social networks and communication channels into a simple, single solution. Founded in 2005, the company allows its users to share content easily while communicating in real time with a Meebo Bar, a toolbar that can be installed on users’ computers. Meebo also allows users to communicate through Meebo Messenger, much like AOL Instant Messenger, and mobile devices.

View full post on Human Interest Stories

If you are flush with funds and are seeking to find a good investment venue where you could deposit your capital, you should be looking at investment opportunities that would surely provide good and secured returns. Why not invest in a hard money specialist? Check out Coastal La Jolla Funding and see how the company could provide you with a good investment chance. Coastal La Jolla Finding is specifically known as a provider of hard money loans. The business is at the bullish side because more borrowers are filing loans at the company.

You know that hard money personal loans and poor credit loans are implementing significantly higher interest rates. That is a usual market practice and is legitimate. That is because such loans are posing greater risks to the lenders. Borrowers of such loan facilities are usually on the desperate side to accept and conform to the high interest rate provisions. That is why hard money loan specialists are also earning more than conventional loan providers. In fact, among the fastest growing financial firms not just in the United States but all around the world are hard money or poor credit loan providers.

That is a good reason why investors flock to hard money loan providers. Like most financial firms, such entities are welcoming investments because doing so is helping them expand and broaden their overall capital. Hard money loan providers know that to be able to attract and motivate investors, good investment rates and returns must be secured and provided. As an investor, it is logical that you aim to place your investments and resources at venues where they can grow to the fullest.

At Costal La Jolla Funding, you can be rest assured that your money would be productive. Some current investors even assert that their investments in the company are earning better that in any other venues. Investments in such loan providers are comparatively faster paced and more yielding than those at equities and other opportunities.

The sub prime mortgage lending sector is problematic during the current times. But Coastal La Jolla Funding sees this slump not as a setback but as an opportunity to further grow businesses. By sticking to such loans and to hard money loans, the company is proving that bad times could be converted into the best profit generating moments.

How can you be assured that the company would not fail? First, Coastal La Jolla Funding has strategies to secure itself and the hard money loans it provides. The company takes some equities to the mortgage loans and several other assets of the borrowers. Thus, no matter what happens, the company is holding security and is ensured that losses on loans even if borrowers become delinquent would not be incurred.

There are also existing legal contracts that are binding the company and its borrowers. Thus, there is a great assurance that the loan facilities are tenured and secured. Before making and placing the investment, you would be oriented to the basic company operations. If you would have any queries or doubts, you could easily raise your concerns and the company would be quick to address those issues.

There would also be secured contracts between you and Coastal La Jolla Funding to give you peace of mind over your investments. You will have the option on the frequency and terms of your investment. If you want, you could opt to collect returns annually, bi-annually or whatever term period you may like.

Investing in Coastal La Jolla Funding can also be considered a good deed and advocacy. If you want to help out financially needy people, investing in the company could be a good revenue and at the same time profitable. You know that most consumers nowadays are finding it hard to secure much needed and necessary loans. Hard money loans providers like Coastal La Jolla Finding is are somehow helping them raise money for their urgent needs for investments, startup businesses and even personal matters.

Author: Tim Doscher
Article Source: EzineArticles.com
News of Solar Power and Alternative Engery

Marshall, Michigan, United States (AHN) – Enbridge Energy Partners said it remained highly committed to complete clean-up efforts near Marshall, Michigan in the aftermath of July 26 oil spill that has stricken Kalamazoo River by the September 27th deadline.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set the two-month deadline for Enbridge to clean up after the oil spill caused by the firm’s leaking pipeline.

This comes as the company works to clean up another recent oil spill in Romeoville, Illinois.

“We continue to treat the Michigan spill as a top priority. While we moved some equipment we had demobilized to Illinois to assist with the response, we continue to provide ample resources to clean up the Michigan spill,” Enbridge said in a statement.

“Our response efforts continue to be focused on meeting our EPA-enforced Sept. 27 clean-up deadline safely and efficiently. Clean-up teams have implemented a five-step approval process for evaluating and inspecting clean-up sites to meet EPA criteria. Many areas in Divisions D and E have reached the fourth and in some cases, fifth phases of the process,” the company stressed.

As of Sept. 9, some 2,055 people are working on the Michigan site where they deployed a total of 124,982 feet of boom in 25 locations.

“Work on backfilling along Talmadge Creek is ramping up through the weekend. Division A at the release site is now complete and initial restoration is well underway. The hydroseeding completed in the area has resulted in sprouting and new grass is visible in places,” Enbridge reported.

A total of 1,247 animals have been cared for with some 866 animals rehabilitated and released while 294 animals are currently in care at Wildlife Response Center.

The media and general public are invited to tour the Wildlife Response Center located at 14998 Old U.S. 27 N. in Marshall, Michigan, on Sept. 14 at 2:00 p.m. ET. Tours have limited availability and those interested should make reservations by calling public information hotline at 1-800-306-6837.

View full post on Economy, Business And Finance Stories

Calgary, Alberta, Canada (AHN) – Alberta Environment filed nine charges Thursday against Suncor Energy for allowing the company’s storm water runoff to enter Athabasca River and providing misleading information on discharge of water and dirt.

If found guilty, Suncor faces a fine of $500,000 on each charge, or a total penalty of $4.5 million.

Alberta Environment said the incident happened in May 2008 when Suncor released the water that entered the Athabasca River while the company was constructing its Voyageur upgrader. In another incident, the government agency said Suncor provided it with misleading information on Suncor’s discharge of water and dirt into the same river from the energy firm’s mine site near Fort McMurray.

Suncor spokesman Brad Bellows denied the government’s accusations. Bellows said the runoff was melting snow and rain from an area undergoing clearing for a tank farm located between Highway 63 and the Athabasca River. Bellows stressed there was no tar in the runoff.

Suncor reported Wednesday that it had started maintenance on one of its two oil sands upgraders near Fort McMurray, together with work on a hydrogen reformer connected to the upgrader.

The maintenance work is expected to last six weeks, during which the upgrader is expected to operate at reduced rates. But Suncor’s other upgrader will continue normal operations. Suncor produced an average of 331,000 barrels of oil per day in August.

Suncor spokesman Brad Bellows denied the government’s accusations. Bellows said the runoff was melting snow and rain from an area undergoing clearing for a tank farm located between Highway 63 and the Athabasca River. Bellows stressed there was no tar in the runoff.

The case is scheduled for a hearing on Nov. 3.

View full post on Economy, Business And Finance Stories

Washington, D.C., United States (AHN) – The Food and Drug Administration has cited the manufacturers of Canada Dry Sparkling Green Tea Ginger Ale and Lipton Green Tea for making unauthorized therapeutic claims about their products.

The agency wants Unilver to correnct claims its makes on its website and packaging for Lipton Green Tea 100% Natural Naturally Decaffeinated.

The company’s website for Lipton Teas ” establish that the product is a drug because it is intended for use in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease,” according to regulators. Sales and marketing of drugs requires a different approval from the FDA.

Unilever’s Lipton website says, “[F]our recent studies in people at risk for coronary disease have shown a significant cholesterol lowering effect from tea or tea flavonoids … One of these studies, on post-menopausal women, found that total cholesterol was lowered by 8% after drinking 8 cups of green tea daily for 12 weeks.”

Regulators also asked the company to correct its product’s label, which says, “packed with protective FLAVONOID ANTIOXIDANTS.” The use of the term “antioxidant” involves different requirements, and the label makes unauthorized nutrient content claims.

The FDA also wrote to Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, the maker of Canada Dry Sparkling Green Tea Ginger Ale.

The agency cited the company for telling consumers their product is “ENHANCED WITH 200 mg OF ANTIOXIDANTS FROM GREEN TEA & VITAMIN C.**” The claim on the packaging has a double asterisk that refers to a statement also on the label, “**Each 8 oz serving contains 200 mg of antioxidants from Green Tea Flavonoids and Vitamin C.”

The companies are not the only ones to receive citations from the FDA. Fleminger Inc. and Redco Foods have also received warning letters about their green tea products. Such letters require a response within 15 days.

Dr. Pepper Snapple Group and Unilever have said they would work with the agency to correct the claims.

View full post on Economy, Business And Finance Stories

I don’t know if you’ve noticed— it’s certainly hard to miss— but the landscape around Austin is changing. As is the skyline. As is the… well, the feel of the city. The flavor.

Some Austinites are not excited about the changes going on. The corporations moving in, the family-owned and operated businesses go down while the thirty-six story condos go up. People who have lived here all their lives (or even just more than ten years) say that this is a different city than the one they remember. Back when they might not even have called Austin a “city.”

There was a time when Motorola was just a type of phone people had, not a place where they worked. When video games were a thing people played, not designed. Where Dell was a thing from a song about a farmer, not a computer company. In short, there was a time when Austin was a big, friendly village where everyone seemed to know everyone.

Now, it’s hard to see the sky without noticing the foreboding skeleton of an incoming condominium projects or a crane in your periphery. Developers are buying up land and displacing local businesses in order to get the best spot downtown for a high rise that will dwarf all the others, that will sell for more money, that will be nicer and closer to all the downtown Austin attractions.

But what are those attractions?

There will always be a Congress Bridge, and so there will always be bats. But will people want to walk from the Sheraton to see them, then get a drink at the Coyote Ugly Saloon franchise? Will they want to eat at the Baby Acapulco’s? What will make the town special when Las Manitas is gone, when all the little businesses that got us to this point are gone, and the only choices for restaurants are in the lobbies of the newest hotels?

What will make Austin Austin? It’s a good question.

It’s easy to see that the city has lost some its appeal. Its uniqueness, its originality. Big business has a way of doing that. But is it so bad? Is it really true that there will be nothing left?

Those small, local places brought people here, it’s true. And they certainly gave Austin its flavor. But millions more people are here now. The city has grown by leaps and bounds. People still need places to live. And the more people there are, the more money is being spent. There is much to be thankful for when we think about this new “bigger” Austin. The Austin real estate market values go up. Many businesses prosper. The city has more money to improve infrastructure and city services like parks. Its hard to allow it to change some of what we love, and some of the changes I’m not happy with. But overall I think it will be okay.

The key is that the people are still here. The same people that made Austin the coolest city in the… well, in my opinion in the entire country —are still here. They’re still waving at you from their yard, still smiling at you on the street. The buildings aren’t the personality in the city —the people in them are. So let’s make sure those people don’t go anywhere, and we’re all gonna be just fine. Yes, we may have to part with a couple businesses and landmarks dear to our hearts, but as long as Austinites keep true to what we love about this city, we will retain the part of our identity that is the most important.