Hard Money Loans

Toronto, Ontario, Canada (AHN) – Toronto’s candidates for mayor are focusing on tax cuts and other economic issues to the detriment of social issues in the city.

With city elections upcoming, the candidates’ speeches center on reduction of vehicle registration fees and land transfer taxes, freezing property taxes, cutting councilors’ office budgets and reducing the city’s payroll.

Leading candidate Councilor Rob Ford promised voters on Friday to have a $1.67 billion surplus during his first four years in office, without reducing city services. To achieve the promise, Ford plans to cut the cost of government by 2.5 percent or $230 million in 2011. Ford also vowed to save $67.6 million by replacing only 50 percent of employees who retire or resign.

Other measures that Ford plans to impose if he wins and replaces outgoing Mayor David Miller are to save $66.7 million by using a more competitive bidding process and another $80 million by doing away with the fair-wage policy. The latter mandates Toronto to pay wages equivalent to union rates of private sector contract workers.

The overemphasis on economic issues has led some voters to ask in town hall meetings for the candidates’ stand on social issues such as hunger, delayed child care subsidies and homelessness. Because of the economic crisis and poverty in Ontario’s capital city, Toronto food banks handed out 1.1 million baskets of groceries in 2009, which is a 14 percent rise compared to 2008.

About 75,000 Toronto households are waiting for affordable shelter, while the child care subsidies of 17,000 Toronto children have been delayed.

Toronto projects a $503 million budget deficit for 2011. With Ford’s planned spending cuts of $525.6 million next year, the city would have a surplus of $22.6 million, which the councilor estimated would go up to $1.67 billion by the end of 2014.

However, several groups such as the Toronto Board of Trade, former budget chiefs and rival candidates dismissed Ford’s budget surplus prediction as too optimistic, but lacking in specifics on how the next mayor would achieve such large targets.

View full post on Economy, Business And Finance Stories

Bell City, CA, United States (AHN) – Eight former officials of Bell City were arrested Tuesday and are facing possible criminal charges for alleged theft of public funds.

Former City Manager Robert Rizzo, the central figure in the salary scandal that broke out in July, was arrested together with former Assistant City Manager Angela Spaccia; Mayor Oscar Hernandez; City Council members Luis Artiga, Teresa Jacobo and George Mirabal; and former City Council members George Cole and Victor Bello.

Los Angeles County District Attorney Steve Cooley was preparing to announce charges against the eight municipal leaders when the arrest was conducted.

The arrests followed a two-month investigation by the DA and federal authorities of the questionably high salaries of Bell officials, including those arrested.

Rizzo is also being accused of giving $1.6 million in loans to himself and 50 city officials. An audit by state Controller John Chiangity showed that funds were allegedly diverted to Rizzo’s retirement accounts in 2008 and 2009 to repay the $160,000 city loans.

California Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown sued current and former Bell city leaders last week to nullify their pay contracts and get back some of their salaries and pension benefits.

Rizzo and other officials stepped down in July amid the scandal and city council officials subsequently slashed their salaries.

View full post on All Stories

Toronto, Ontario, Canada (AHN) – Metrolinx Chief Executive Officer Bruce McCuaig rejected on Thursday proposals from Toronto mayor candidates to improve the city’s transportation problem. McCuaig said the Big Move plan has been endorsed by municipal councils and Ontario, and the next move is to deliver the project.

The $50-billion project will transform Toronto’s transit system in the next 25 years. Components of the project include construction of the Union Station-Pearson Airport air-rail link, expansion and improvement of GO Transit and development and investment strategy.

Unless the city’s transit system is modernized, residents will have to battle traffic going to their work daily. The cost of the gridlock to residents of the Greater Toronto Area is estimated at $6 billion yearly and may escalate to $15 billion.

McCuaig disclosed Metrolinx has 10 major projects lined up, but the provincial agency is focusing on five. These are:

• the Sheppard light rail transit line scheduled for completion by 2014
• the York VIVA Rapid Way targeted to be completed by 2020
• the Englington light rail transit line set to start tunneling in 2011
• the Scarborough rapid transit renewal which will start 2015
• the Finch light rail transit line to begin in 2015 and be completed in 2019.

The Metrolinx CEO discussed the status of the transport projects at a Board of Trade event, partly to address the proposals from the five mayoral candidates in Toronto.

Rod Ford, Rocco Rossi and Sarah Thomson have proposed shifting financial resources already committed to Transit City to their own transit solutions focused on building subways. George Smitherman is in favor of following Metrolinx’s plans, except for minor changes. Only Joe Pantalone favored following the original plans of Transit City.

However, updated plans have delayed parts of the project and $4 billion in funding as Ontario grapples with a record-high budget deficit.

View full post on Economy, Business And Finance Stories

London, England, United Kingdom (AHN) – British’s Financial Services Authority fined Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) $30 million (20 million pounds) for failuring to inform the City regulator that one of the bank’s officers under investigation for fraud in the U.S. was transferred to the U.K.

The FSA identified Goldman official as Fabrice Tourre, who was facing a Securities and Exchange Commission probe for fraud.

While the SEC investigation was ongoing, Goldman reassigned Tourre to its London office from its New York unit.

The SEC had charged Goldman with failure to disclose that a hedge fund betting against a mortgage-backed security called Abacus picked some of the mortgage loans included in the portfolio. The move cost investors up to $1 billion.

Because of the charges, a U.S. Senate Committee questioned seven Goldman directors, including Tourre. Goldman eventually settled the case and paid SEC a penalty of $550 million (355.5 million pounds) without admitting wrongdoing.

Reports said Goldman is expected to admit it made a mistake in not informing the FSA of Tourre’s transfer, but the bank has so far officially decline to comment on the matter.

Goldman, like many American banks hit by the global financial crisis, is trying to rebuild its image and rebuild public trust.

Goldman has also been accused by Greece of profiteering from the country’s sovereign debt crisis by short selling the nation’s bonds.

The FSA had been slapping large western banks with hefty penalties. In 2009, the FSA penalized another U.S. bank, JPMorgan, a record $49.5 million (33 million pounds) for the bank’s failure to separate client money from its own. Also last year, the regulator penalized Barclays, Credit Suisse and Commerzbank $3.7 million (2.45 million pounds) each for failure to maintain proper trading records.

In August, FSA fined the London branch of French bank Societe Generale $2.4 million (1.57 million pounds) for lack of accurate transaction records.

View full post on All Stories

Austin has long been a home for friendly folk- friendly to each other, friendly to animals, and friendly to the environment. What used to be considered as only the concerns of hippies and the bohemian sect, environmentalism is now at the forefront of commercial and residential design, and “green” businesses are popping up nationwide. Austin, however, was the first city in the United States to establish a local green-building program, laying out environmentally friendly and sustainable guidelines for home builders and its interested citizens back in 1991.

Since the Austin real estate market is known nationwide as the leader of these green building methods, the National Association of Home Builders chose the city as its hub to launch an industry-wide effort to establish green-building guidelines in 2004. These guidelines now provide a practical nationally recognized framework for builders to follow to reduce a home’s environmental impact by making them more energy efficient, improving indoor environmental quality, and so on. Though Austin has already been using similar guidelines for over a decade, now the rest of the country is following suit.

The City of Austin and Austin Energy provide a great resource to owners of Austin homes, and new home builders, who are looking for ways to conserve energy, and build an environmentally friendly home. The city’s website offers a list of companies willing to do an energy analysis of a home that will determine possible options to help the house conserve more energy, with suggestions ranging from air conditioning repair to weather stripping doors. The city then will offer a 20 to 75% of that cost.

For those Austinites building a new house or commercial building, the city created the Austin Energy Green Building organization to promote the construction of high quality, more sustainable buildings, and has even zoned sections of the city’s real estate to require an Austin Energy Green Building rating. Four times a year, the organization also holds a one day “Green By Design” workshop open to the public. The workshop provides an overview of the green building process, and brings in design, building, engineering, landscaping, and Austin real estate professionals with many years of experience in homebuilding and remodeling, to help make sense of it all.

In March of this year, Austin was named as the city leading the country in “cleantech” by SustainLane, an online resource center that offers sustainability tips to state and local government. The term “cleantech” refers to venture capital-based startups based in green technology, with Austin as the front runner with seven such startups, ranging from internet-controlled irrigation to geothermal energy technologies. To keep Austin on the cutting edge of green technology, the Clean Energy Incubator program was set up to help young clean energy businesses succeed by commercializing their ideas. With citizens, government, and forward thinking businesses, Austin will likely be the city to follow in the environmental battle for years to come.

Top 10 Luxury Home Markets To Watch for Price Increases or Reductions

The Unique Homes Magazine has listed 25 luxury home markets to watch in 2007 in its January issue. According to the Unique Homes report the 25 luxury markets will indicate where the luxury real estate market is heading to. These markets along with features that make them stand out from the rest are worth watching out for.

The following is a brief report on the top 10 luxury home markets to watch for price increases or reductions in 2007.

1. Annapolis, Maryland. The waterfront city located on Chesapeake Bay offers excellent boating and affordable prices compared to Washington’s luxury enclaves. With Washington and Baltimore within reasonable commute, this city is highly desirable.

2. Asheville, North Carolina. An eclectic ambiance and low-key lifestyle attracts people to Asheville which continues to remain one of the hottest places for luxury home buyers.

3. Aspen, Colorado. From a ski enclave this luxury market has grown into a platinum location. With its four-season appeal and restrictive zoning policies, Aspen is still a highly-sought after destination.

4. Atlanta, Georgia. The city offers several new upscale communities, numerous lifestyle amenities, retreats and much sought after waterfront luxury homes.

5. Austin, Texas. A strong real estate market that saw record gains in 2006, the reputable University of Texas, the scenic lakes and the great music attracts buyers to this hill country.

6. Bellevue/Medina, Washington. With prices going up at 28 percent, the market has still not peaked and several upscale neighborhoods are available at a lower price range when compared to other markets.

7. Beverly Hills, California. One of the top ranked luxury markets that is perpetually in demand, Beverly Hills continues to be untarnished and idolized as the Mecca for luxury. Hollywood Hills is currently a hot market for buyers.

8. Idaho. The growing resort markets in the state garner attention for the state that is making its presence felt in the luxury home market.

9. Jupiter, Florida. The boom has arrived here after Tiger Woods’ purchase of a 10-acre estate for $38 m. The market continues to surge on this exclusive island.

10. Manhattan Uptown, downtown, midtown. The luxury market is upbeat with record sales of more than $5 m in 2006 accelerated by Wall Streeters. Co-ops and town houses are favorites among buyers here.

If you are interested in buying or selling a home, condo or any other type of real estate in any of these markets, be sure to seek out the services of a real estate agent to advise you about current local market conditions.

I don’t know if you’ve noticed— it’s certainly hard to miss— but the landscape around Austin is changing. As is the skyline. As is the… well, the feel of the city. The flavor.

Some Austinites are not excited about the changes going on. The corporations moving in, the family-owned and operated businesses go down while the thirty-six story condos go up. People who have lived here all their lives (or even just more than ten years) say that this is a different city than the one they remember. Back when they might not even have called Austin a “city.”

There was a time when Motorola was just a type of phone people had, not a place where they worked. When video games were a thing people played, not designed. Where Dell was a thing from a song about a farmer, not a computer company. In short, there was a time when Austin was a big, friendly village where everyone seemed to know everyone.

Now, it’s hard to see the sky without noticing the foreboding skeleton of an incoming condominium projects or a crane in your periphery. Developers are buying up land and displacing local businesses in order to get the best spot downtown for a high rise that will dwarf all the others, that will sell for more money, that will be nicer and closer to all the downtown Austin attractions.

But what are those attractions?

There will always be a Congress Bridge, and so there will always be bats. But will people want to walk from the Sheraton to see them, then get a drink at the Coyote Ugly Saloon franchise? Will they want to eat at the Baby Acapulco’s? What will make the town special when Las Manitas is gone, when all the little businesses that got us to this point are gone, and the only choices for restaurants are in the lobbies of the newest hotels?

What will make Austin Austin? It’s a good question.

It’s easy to see that the city has lost some its appeal. Its uniqueness, its originality. Big business has a way of doing that. But is it so bad? Is it really true that there will be nothing left?

Those small, local places brought people here, it’s true. And they certainly gave Austin its flavor. But millions more people are here now. The city has grown by leaps and bounds. People still need places to live. And the more people there are, the more money is being spent. There is much to be thankful for when we think about this new “bigger” Austin. The Austin real estate market values go up. Many businesses prosper. The city has more money to improve infrastructure and city services like parks. Its hard to allow it to change some of what we love, and some of the changes I’m not happy with. But overall I think it will be okay.

The key is that the people are still here. The same people that made Austin the coolest city in the… well, in my opinion in the entire country —are still here. They’re still waving at you from their yard, still smiling at you on the street. The buildings aren’t the personality in the city —the people in them are. So let’s make sure those people don’t go anywhere, and we’re all gonna be just fine. Yes, we may have to part with a couple businesses and landmarks dear to our hearts, but as long as Austinites keep true to what we love about this city, we will retain the part of our identity that is the most important.

The price of housing is a major challenge in the United States. Some estimates note that more than 50% of the population cannot afford a median priced home. According to National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), of the total number of new and existing homes sold nationwide during the third quarter, only 40.4 percent were affordable for families earning the median U.S. income of $59,600.

But it is good news that housing affordability on the national level has not changed much in the third quarter in spite of a rise in the mortgage interest rates during the last quarter. This was because many markets saw a slight decrease in their home prices, which helped offset the rise in mortgage rates.

Indianapolis (Indiana) is the most affordable city for homes in America, based on the 2006 third quarter report of the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Opportunity Index (HOI). The city achieved this status for the fifth consecutive quarter.

Of the total number of housing units sold in Indianapolis during the third quarter, 86 percent of homes were priced at or below the U.S. median household income of $65,100. Homes in this metro area had a median sales price of $122,000, which is slightly higher from $120,000 of the previous quarter.

It is interesting to note that the most affordable U.S. cities for homes, condos and other real estate are largely from the northern industrial metro areas. The other larger cities that top the list for affordable homes in the third quarter after Indianapolis are Youngstown-Warren-Boardman (Ohio-Pennsylvania); Detroit-Livonia-Dearborn (Michigan); Buffalo-Niagara Falls (New York); and Grand Rapids and Wyoming (Michigan).

The report also lists the top seven smaller cities in America that have the most affordable housing markets. These are: Bay City in Michigan, Springfield in Ohio, Mansfield in Ohio, Lansing-East Lansing in Michigan, Lima in Ohio, Battle Creek in Michigan and Canton-Massillon in Ohio.

For both major metros and small metros, many of the least affordable cities are located in California. The least affordable major metro areas are Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine, Modesto, Stockton, and San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, in that order. The least affordable smaller metros (less than 500,000 people) include: Salinas, Merced, Madera, Napa, and Santa Barbara-Santa Maria.

The good news for homebuyers is that there are many affordable cities in the United States. Moreover, even for cities that rated poorly for affordability, there may be some communities within the larger city that have affordable housing. For example, although the San Diego metro in California rated poorly overall for affordability, there are some communities in San Diego priced to meet the needs of lower-income home buyers. A good real estate agent can help you choose a community where you want to live based on your housing budget and needs.

The foreclosure market is an attractive option for buyers wanting to invest in real estate. A foreclosed property is a mortgaged property that has been taken over by the lender due to non-payment of the mortgage. The lender then sells the property in order to recover the money, often at below market prices. Foreclosed homes, condos and other properties can for make excellent investments and is a popular choice for those entering the real estate market.

The October 2006 issue of Business 2.0 Magazine ranks the top 10 foreclosure markets in the United States. Greeley in Colorado tops the list followed by Detroit in Michigan, Miami in Florida, Indianapolis in Indiana, Ft. Lauderdale in Florida, Denver in Colorado, Dayton in Ohio, Dallas and Fort Worth in Texas, and Atlanta in Georgia.

Greeley, CO, has the largest number of foreclosure households in the country, with 0.59% of homes falling in the category, an increase by 14.7% since January 2006. The report holds aggressive residential development, risky underwriting practices and stagnant wages as the main causes.

Detroit, MI, stands next with 0.51% of the households in foreclosure. The badly performing auto industry and the resulting impact to autoworkers’ incomes has contributed to number of homes in foreclosure in this city.

Third on the list is Miami, FL, where 0.37% of the households are in foreclosure, a staggering 91% increase since January 2006. The report states a weakening economy, higher property insurance premiums, and rising energy and interest rates, as the reasons for this rapid increase.

The fourth among the top ten foreclosure markets is Indianapolis, IN. Although the foreclosure rates are slightly lower from last year, still the portion of households in foreclosure stands at 0.35%. Setbacks and layoffs in the city’s auto industry together with falling home prices have contributed to foreclosure rates in this city.

Fort Lauderdale, FL, stands fifth with 0.34% of households entering foreclosure, which is up by a whopping 118.5% since January 2006.

Denver (with 0.33% of households in foreclosure), Dayton (with 0.33% of households in foreclosure), Dallas (with 0.31% of households in foreclosures), Fort Worth (with 0.31% of households in foreclosure) and Atlanta (with 0.31% of households in foreclosures) round out the top 10 foreclosure markets.

If you are looking to invest in the foreclosure market, consult a real estate agent who can help you clinch the best deal on the foreclosure property of your choice.

Some people choose to use a real estate agent and some people choose to go it alone. One thing I have noticed over the years is that a number of seasoned investors looking in a new city will seek out a good agent while novice investors will frequently go it alone. I have even had a number of successful real estate agents seek out my help when they are moving to our city. Why do some of these seasoned investors choose to work with an agent? Below is a list of 7 benefits of using an agent.

1. Understand potential restrictions of the property. I recently heard a story from a friend at the city development office in Austin Texas. A couple had saved up for their retirement. They wanted to retire and live out in the hill country. They went to the foreclosure auctions. At the auction they purchased a lot for 500,000. It had great views and they were going to build their dream house on it. They had researched the lot before the auction and found it was zoned SFR which means a single family residence can be built on it. After purchasing the lot they started plans to build their retirement house. At this time they discovered the lot was in the 25 year floodplain. My friend at the city development office explained that the lot could not be built on and was basically worthless.

2. Know about new developments that might affect a properties value. A good realtor will know of proposed new developments that might affect different properties in which a buyer is interested. Whether these developments are positive or negative can be valuable information when weighing different housing options.

3. Find potential problems with a property. It is always a good idea to have a home inspector look at a potential house. However, a Realtor is a good first line of defense to see if a house has inherent problems. A Realtor that can know about common problems, such as foundation or electrical, that affect a particular neighborhood.

4. Understand contracts specifics. Whenever you buy or sell a house you are entering into a large personal transaction. It helps to have someone on your side that deals with these types of transactions on a daily basis. A Realtor can help you understand contracts and can explain what is typical for your area. The most common pitfall into which I see unrepresented buyers fall is to become involved in an atypical contract that is not to their benefit. For instance a seller will sign an offer that has an option period that is 4 times longer than what is typical. A buyer might put in offers on multiple properties with long option periods. The buyer will wait and see if the market appreciates. If the market has appreciated the buyer buys the house at now and undervalued price. If the market has gone down the buyer walks away.

5. Misperception of a benefit of going it alone. Buyers frequently think that by not using a buyers agent they will get a better deal from the seller. In most situation the listing agent asks for 6 percent from the seller. If a buyer comes with an agent the listing agent splits the 6 percent with the buyers agent. If an unrepresented buyer comes the listing agent keeps the whole 6 percent. On the selling side, For Sale By Owners (FSBO) often think they are saving alot of money by avoiding a listing agent. Nationally, FSBO homes sell for 14 percent less than agent listed homes in the same neighborhoods. In addition alot of FSBO’s still end up having a buyers agents involved. There is also money spent on advertising. Since an agent has experience marketing homes the agent often can spend money more effectively on advertising. Agents often know which advertising sources produce the most potential buyers.

6. Save time when looking for listings. Looking for listings without an agent can take up large chunks of time. When looking with an agent you can see several homes in a few hours. When going it alone you have to call the listing agent for each house and wait at the house for the agent to arrive and open up the house. In addition agents often know houses which are not listed or may have already identified potential problems with a particular house of interest.

7. Insure Security. When a home is listed with a broker, agents coming to the house have to usually log in. This allows the listing agent to keep a record of every party coming into the house. Since their business is on the line, agents are more likely to protect the house from damage or theft. For a variety of reasons, it is generally not a good idea to have random people you do not know come into your house. Often sellers simply have a phone number, but that phone could be their house, a friend’s house, a pay phone, or even a stolen phone.

Searching for a home can be stressful and difficult but it can also be fun. Whether you choose to look for a home on your own or with a Realtor its a good idea to be a extremely careful when you seek out your dream home.